Does a 289 engined car have different mounting arrangements for the clutch slave cylinder to the 260?
I ask because there seems to have been some fairly crude modifications made to my car to enable the slave cylinder to fit.
More importantly, following a re-seal of the slave cylinder, the piston now shoots out of the end of the cylinder when I depress the clutch. Getting the correct travel/distance between slave cylinder and clutch operating arm will mean making up a new and (in my view) excessively long push rod.
Surely that can't be correct?
In case it's relevant, my engine is a C5AE 6015 with a date code of 6C29. The car has the stock 'box fitted.
Thanks
I ask because there seems to have been some fairly crude modifications made to my car to enable the slave cylinder to fit.
More importantly, following a re-seal of the slave cylinder, the piston now shoots out of the end of the cylinder when I depress the clutch. Getting the correct travel/distance between slave cylinder and clutch operating arm will mean making up a new and (in my view) excessively long push rod.
Surely that can't be correct?
In case it's relevant, my engine is a C5AE 6015 with a date code of 6C29. The car has the stock 'box fitted.
Thanks