What is the Seller's Intention?
We all are familiar with the misinformation that was out there on Wikipedia. We have a duty to try to separate fact from fiction when it comes to Tigers. The eBay posting says that this is the right socket and bar for the Tiger. It is not. Had the seller indicated that it was similar to the correct part, no one would have had any problems with his listing. But he chose to leave out that bit of fact. Why? Most of us would assume that he is trying to make more money off the part than what he would make if he had included the true information. I agree with you that people who make an effort to get a tool that is close to the original are making an effort, especially when the correct tool is very hard to come by. But labeling the incorrect tool as the correct one is just dishonest. I think that is what the postings here on the Forum are trying to reflect.
why fault people for making an effort.
We all are familiar with the misinformation that was out there on Wikipedia. We have a duty to try to separate fact from fiction when it comes to Tigers. The eBay posting says that this is the right socket and bar for the Tiger. It is not. Had the seller indicated that it was similar to the correct part, no one would have had any problems with his listing. But he chose to leave out that bit of fact. Why? Most of us would assume that he is trying to make more money off the part than what he would make if he had included the true information. I agree with you that people who make an effort to get a tool that is close to the original are making an effort, especially when the correct tool is very hard to come by. But labeling the incorrect tool as the correct one is just dishonest. I think that is what the postings here on the Forum are trying to reflect.